The Supreme Court of India in the case of Navjot Singh Sidhu held that
A. A conviction cannot be suspended using Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
B. A sentence cannot be suspended using Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
C. A conviction can be suspended using Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure but the petitioner needs to specifically draw the attention of the court to the consequences that may arise if the conviction is not suspended
D. Only a sentence can be suspended using Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure but the petitioner needs to specifically draw the attention of the court to the consequences that may arise if the sentence is not suspended
Answer: Option C
This Question Belongs to Law >> Code Of Criminal Procedure
A. Three hundred rupees
B. Four hundred rupees
C. Five hundred rupees
D. Any Amount
A. Section 310A
B. Section 311A
C. Section 312A
D. Section 313A
Which of the following offence can be compounded without the permission of the court?
A. Voluntarily causing hurt under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code 1860
B. Causing miscarriage under section 312 of the Indian Penal Code 1860
C. Criminal breach of trust under section 406 of the Indian Penal Code 1860
D. Voluntarily causing grievous hurt under section 325 of the Indian Penal Code 1860
A. Five years
B. Four years
C. Three years
D. Two years
Join The Discussion