There is an equivalent join expression that can be substituted for all subquery expressions.
A. True
B. False
Answer: Option A
Solution (By Examveda Team)
Option A: True - This option is correct. In SQL, joins can often be used instead of subqueries to achieve similar results. Specifically, correlated subqueries and some non-correlated subqueries can be rewritten as joins, improving performance and readability in some cases. However, not all subqueries can be directly replaced by joins, especially when dealing with complex aggregations or conditions that require row-level operations.Option B: False - This option is incorrect. SQL provides several types of joins (such as INNER JOIN, LEFT JOIN, etc.) that can often be used as alternatives to subqueries, depending on the specific query requirements.
Conclusion:
The statement "There is an equivalent join expression that can be substituted for all subquery expressions" is Option A: True. While not all subqueries can be directly replaced by joins, SQL provides mechanisms to substitute many subquery expressions with join expressions, making queries more efficient and sometimes easier to understand. Therefore, the correct answer is True.
Related Questions on Introduction to SQL
You can add a row using SQL in a database with which of the following?
A. ADD
B. CREATE
C. INSERT
D. MAKE
The command to remove rows from a table 'CUSTOMER' is:
A. REMOVE FROM CUSTOMER ...
B. DROP FROM CUSTOMER ...
C. DELETE FROM CUSTOMER WHERE ...
D. UPDATE FROM CUSTOMER ...
A. limits the column data that are returned.
B. limits the row data are returned.
C. Both A and B are correct.
D. Neither A nor B are correct.
Which of the following is the original purpose of SQL?
A. To specify the syntax and semantics of SQL data definition language
B. To specify the syntax and semantics of SQL manipulation language
C. To define the data structures
D. All of the above

Join The Discussion