Under Section 18 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, misrepresentation falls under:
A. A statement of fact, which is false, would be misrepresentation if the maker believes it to be true, but which is not justified by the information he possesses
B. Any breach of duty which gains an advantage to the person committing it by misleading another to his prejudice, there being no intention to deceive
C. Causing a party to an agreement to make a mistake as to the substance of the thing which is the subject of the agreement, even though done innocently
D. All of them
Answer: Option D
Indian Contract Act:- Gods displayed in showcase of a shop with price tag is -
A. Invitation to offer
B. Counteroffer
C. Communication
D. None of these
A. Is available to Y's representatives alone
B. Is available to Z alone
C. Is available to Y's representatives & Z both
D. Is available to Y's representatives & after the death of Z, his representatives
Moses v. Macferlan (1555-1774) is a case relating to
A. Theory of unjust enrichment
B. The right of lien
C. Test of agency
D. Doctrine of frustration
A. The active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact
B. A promise made without any intention of performing it
C. The suggestion, as a fact, of that which is true, by one who does believe it to be true
D. None above

Join The Discussion