Under the provisions of section 53 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, the relinquishment by one co-parcener in favour of another cannot be said to be a transfer unless:
A. It is found to be a device to evade creditors
B. It is found to be a device to evade debtors
C. It is to be a device to evade the government policy
D. None of the above
Answer: Option A
This Question Belongs to Law >> Transfer Of Property Act
Related Questions on Transfer of Property Act
A. Section 13
B. Section 14
C. Section 15
D. Section 16
Case of "Raj Kumar Kundu v. Mcqueen" is related to
A. Lis pendens
B. Part performance
C. Mortgage
D. Ostensible owner
A. Transfer by ostensible owner of the property for consideration
B. Transfer by owner of the property in which a widowhas life interest for maintenance
C. Both A and B
D. Neither A nor B
Which property cannot be transferred?
A. A public office
B. A mere chance to succeed
C. A mere right of re-entry
D. All of the above
Join The Discussion