What was the main judgement of the Supreme Court regarding Parliament's right to amend the Fundamental Rights in the Kesavananda Bharati vs Union of India case?
A. The Supreme Court took away the right of Parliament to amend the Fundamental Rights
B. The Supreme Court declared that Parliament had no right to amend the Fundamental Rights
C. The Supreme Court upheld the right of Parliament to amend any part of Constitution including Part III of the Constitution but it also declared that Parliament had no right to amend the basic structure of the Constitution
D. None of the above
Answer: Option C
A. To provide self-governance
B. To recognize traditional rights
C. To create autonomous region in tribal areas
D. To free tribal people from exploitation
Which one of the following is mainly associated with Panchayati Raj in tribal areas?
A. P. K. Thungan Committee
B. Dilip Singh Bhuria Committee
C. Sadiq Ali Committee
D. Doomarlal Baitha Committee
A. Justice V. R. Krishna Aiyyer
B. Justice P. N. Bhagwati
C. Upendra Baxi
D. Nani Palkhiwala
Under which article/articles, the High Courts and the Supreme Court can issue writs?
A. Articles 44 and 56
B. Article 123 and 213
C. Article 32 and 226
D. Articles 53 and 153

Join The Discussion