Where a person transfers property representing that he has a present interest therein, whereas he has, in fact, only a spes successionis, the transferee is entitled to the benefit of Section 43, if he has taken the transfer on the faith of that representation and for consideration as Section 43 and Section 6(a) operate on different fields. This principle was laid down in:-
A. Rajesh Kanta Roy v. Shanti Debi
B. Chunchun Jha v. Ebadat Ali
C. Jumma Masjid, Mercara v. Kodimaniandra Deviah
D. Ram Baran Prasad v. Ram Mohit Hazra
Answer: Option C
This Question Belongs to Law >> Transfer Of Property Act
Related Questions on Transfer of Property Act
A. Section 13
B. Section 14
C. Section 15
D. Section 16
Case of "Raj Kumar Kundu v. Mcqueen" is related to
A. Lis pendens
B. Part performance
C. Mortgage
D. Ostensible owner
A. Transfer by ostensible owner of the property for consideration
B. Transfer by owner of the property in which a widowhas life interest for maintenance
C. Both A and B
D. Neither A nor B
Which property cannot be transferred?
A. A public office
B. A mere chance to succeed
C. A mere right of re-entry
D. All of the above
Join The Discussion