Examveda
Examveda

Which of the following is incorrect under the Evidence Act?

A. In a case where 'A' is charged with receiving a particular stolen wristwatch knowing the same to be stolen-The fact that at the same time he was in possession of other such stolen articles is relevant

B. In a case where 'A' is tried for the murder of 'B' by intentionally shooting him to death-The fact that 'A' was in the habit of shooting at people with intent to murder them is relevant

C. In a case where 'A' is sued for damages for bite injury caused by his dog to 'B', 'A' having known the dog to be ferocious-The fact that the dog had previously bitten 'X', 'Y' and 'Z' is relevant

D. In a case where 'A' is accused of defaming 'B' by publishing an imputation intended to harm the reputation of 'B'-The fact of previous publications by 'A' respecting 'B', showing ill-will on the part of 'A' towards 'B' is relevant

Answer: Option B


This Question Belongs to Law >> Indian Evidence Act

Join The Discussion

Related Questions on Indian Evidence Act

Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, permits the use of discovery evidence, which lays down strictly as to how much of the information contained in the statement of the accused is made admissible. Which one of the following information is relevant under this Section?

A. That relates to only the place of occurrence

B. That relates to nature of the object

C. That relates to the past user of the object

D. Information given by the accused, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered