Which of the following is incorrect under the Evidence Act?
A. In a case where 'A' is charged with receiving a particular stolen wristwatch knowing the same to be stolen-The fact that at the same time he was in possession of other such stolen articles is relevant
B. In a case where 'A' is tried for the murder of 'B' by intentionally shooting him to death-The fact that 'A' was in the habit of shooting at people with intent to murder them is relevant
C. In a case where 'A' is sued for damages for bite injury caused by his dog to 'B', 'A' having known the dog to be ferocious-The fact that the dog had previously bitten 'X', 'Y' and 'Z' is relevant
D. In a case where 'A' is accused of defaming 'B' by publishing an imputation intended to harm the reputation of 'B'-The fact of previous publications by 'A' respecting 'B', showing ill-will on the part of 'A' towards 'B' is relevant
Answer: Option B
Which section of the Indian Evidence Act protects communication during marriage?
A. Section 122
B. Section 123
C. Section 124
D. Section 125
A. Of 'B', because 'B' is a merchant in Delhi. 'A' has written many letters addressed to 'B'
B. Of 'C' because 'C' is a clerk of 'A' 'C's duty was to examineand file A's correspondence
C. Of 'D' because 'D' is Z's broker to whom Z habitually submitted the letters purporting to Bwritten by 'A' for the purpose of his advice
D. Of all the above
A. Section 120
B. Section 126
C. Section 123
D. Section 98
A. That relates to only the place of occurrence
B. That relates to nature of the object
C. That relates to the past user of the object
D. Information given by the accused, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered
Join The Discussion