A suit for possession of an immovable property based on title by a plaintiff, who has been dispossessed can be filed:
A. Within six months of dispossession as per Section 5 of Specific Relief Act
B. Even beyond six months and upto a period of 12 years as provided in Article 65 of the Limitation Act when dispossession is of a person who is the title holder of the immovable property
C. Beyond six months against a rank trespasser, by an owner of an immovable property, if dispossession of the plaintiff of an immovable property takes place after plaintiff had already given a public notice of his being in actual physical possession of the suit property against the world at large
D. Beyond six months of dispossession of a person having an ownership title, and against a person who dispossesses the person having ownership title provided only if the title of the plaintiff is recorded either in the municipal records or in the revenue records
Answer: Option B
This Question Belongs to Law >> Specific Relief Act
Which section of the Specific Relief Act provides for grant of temporary and permanent injunctions:
A. Section 35
B. Section 36
C. Section 37
D. None of the above
Which of the following statements is wrong? Perpetual injunction
A. Is granted by a decree
B. Can be granted without notice to and hearing the defendant
C. Can never be granted without notice to and hearing the defendant
D. Can be granted on merits only
Suit for specific performance is claimed when applicant is . . . . . . . . .
A. Necessary party
B. Proper party
C. Neither (A) nor (B)
D. Both (A) and (C)
A. In a contract, where plaintiff has been given an unfair advantage over the defendant
B. In a case where the contract is not enforceable at the instance of the other party
C. Where the defendant entered into the contract under circumstances which though not rendering the contract voidable, makes it inequitable to enforce specific performance
D. Where performance of the contract would involve some hardship on the defendant which he did not foresee, whereas its non-performance would involve no such hardship on the plaintiff
Join The Discussion