A was negligently by B, a medical doctor. Consequently A dies. Because of the death of A his daughter C could not marry D. C claims damages from B, asserting that her failure to marry D was a direct consequence of doctor's negligence in treating her father. Will she succeed?
A. She may
B. Yes she will, provided the proved she really was about to many D
C. Yes she will, provided she proved her father also wanted her to marry D
D. She will not
Answer: Option D
This Question Belongs to Law >> Law Of Torts
The 'tort of intimidation' was propounded in
A. Winterbottom v. Wright
B. Pasley v. Freeman
C. Winsmore v. Greenbank
D. Rookes v. Barnard
The maxim 'scienti non fit injuria' means
A. Where there is no fault, there is no remedy
B. Mere knowledge does not imply consent to take risk
C. Mere giving consent does not imply to take risk
D. Scientific knowledge is not enough to cause injury
A. Scott v. London & St. Katharine Docks Co.
B. Hedley Byrne Co. Ltd. v. Heller & Partners
C. Derry v. Peek
D. Cann v. Willson
A. Section 82 of the Evidence Act
B. Section 102 of the Evidence Act
C. Section 122 of the Evidence Act
D. Section 124 of the Evidence Act
Join The Discussion