An arbitration agreement specifying even number of arbitrators cannot be a sole ground to render arbitration agreement invalid' - this was laid down in:
A. Grid corporation of Orissa Ltd. v. Indian Charge Chrome, AIR 1998 SC 1761
B. K. K. Modi v. K. N. Modi, AIR 1998 SC 1297
C. M.M.T.C. Ltd. v. Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd., AIR 1997 SC 605
D. Sundaram Finance Ltd. v. N.E.P.C. India Ltd., AIR 1999 SC 565
Answer: Option C
Which of the Sections provide for the number of conciliations:
A. Section 63
B. Section 64
C. Section 65
D. Section 66
A. M.M.T.C. Ltd. v. Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd.
B. Sunderam Finance Ltd. v. N.E.P.C. Ltd.
C. Olympus Super structures Pvt. Ltd. v. Meera Vijay
D. Orma Impex Pvt. Ltd. v. Nissari Pvt. Ltd.
A. Is void and non-actionable
B. Is to be construed as being of reference of disputes to a sole arbitrator
C. Is to be construed as being of reference of disputes to three arbitrators
D. Is to be construed as being of reference of disputes to five arbitrators with the fifth arbitrator being nominated by the two arbitrators of each party
While considering the grant of interim measures, the Court may see whether:
A. The applicant has made prima facie case
B. The balance of convenience is in his favour
C. He would suffer irreparable injury if such measures are not granted
D. All of the above
Join The Discussion