Consider the following situation:
The plaintiff, while passing through the public way near defendant's premises injured by fall of snow accumulated on the roof of the defendant's house as a result of severe storm, for which no warning had been given by the defendant to passer-by. It is a case of which one of the following?
A. Nuisance only
B. Negligence only
C. Nuisance and negligence both
D. An act of God
Answer: Option B
Related Questions on Law of Torts
The 'tort of intimidation' was propounded in
A. Winterbottom v. Wright
B. Pasley v. Freeman
C. Winsmore v. Greenbank
D. Rookes v. Barnard
The maxim 'scienti non fit injuria' means
A. Where there is no fault, there is no remedy
B. Mere knowledge does not imply consent to take risk
C. Mere giving consent does not imply to take risk
D. Scientific knowledge is not enough to cause injury
A. Scott v. London & St. Katharine Docks Co.
B. Hedley Byrne Co. Ltd. v. Heller & Partners
C. Derry v. Peek
D. Cann v. Willson
A. Section 82 of the Evidence Act
B. Section 102 of the Evidence Act
C. Section 122 of the Evidence Act
D. Section 124 of the Evidence Act
Join The Discussion