Dacoity with murder creates co-extensive responsibility of each participant because
A. Collective liability is the core-essence whether it was culminated suddenly or not
B. Mere non-participation in dacoity will not exempt from criminal liability since there was pre-concert
C. Planning was to commit only dacoity, but another person, for earlier enemity, abetted to commit murder while there was no common object
D. There must be one or more participants for the constructive action by each member
Answer: Option A
The 'tort of intimidation' was propounded in
A. Winterbottom v. Wright
B. Pasley v. Freeman
C. Winsmore v. Greenbank
D. Rookes v. Barnard
The maxim 'scienti non fit injuria' means
A. Where there is no fault, there is no remedy
B. Mere knowledge does not imply consent to take risk
C. Mere giving consent does not imply to take risk
D. Scientific knowledge is not enough to cause injury
A. Scott v. London & St. Katharine Docks Co.
B. Hedley Byrne Co. Ltd. v. Heller & Partners
C. Derry v. Peek
D. Cann v. Willson
A. Section 82 of the Evidence Act
B. Section 102 of the Evidence Act
C. Section 122 of the Evidence Act
D. Section 124 of the Evidence Act
Join The Discussion