Disputes between 'A' and 'B' are referred to arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The final award is rendered on 1st June 2019 in favour of 'B'. During the ensuing summer vacations of the Court an urgent situation arises in which 'B' wishes to seek interim relief. 'B' can
A. Approach the arbitral tribunal under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for interim orders
B. Approach the court of competent jurisdiction under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for interim orders
C. Not obtain any interim orders as the final award has been passed
D. Approach the Supreme Court for interim orders
Answer: Option B
Which of the Sections provide for the number of conciliations:
A. Section 63
B. Section 64
C. Section 65
D. Section 66
A. M.M.T.C. Ltd. v. Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd.
B. Sunderam Finance Ltd. v. N.E.P.C. Ltd.
C. Olympus Super structures Pvt. Ltd. v. Meera Vijay
D. Orma Impex Pvt. Ltd. v. Nissari Pvt. Ltd.
A. Is void and non-actionable
B. Is to be construed as being of reference of disputes to a sole arbitrator
C. Is to be construed as being of reference of disputes to three arbitrators
D. Is to be construed as being of reference of disputes to five arbitrators with the fifth arbitrator being nominated by the two arbitrators of each party
While considering the grant of interim measures, the Court may see whether:
A. The applicant has made prima facie case
B. The balance of convenience is in his favour
C. He would suffer irreparable injury if such measures are not granted
D. All of the above
Join The Discussion