A. Prohibited by law being dangerous to the society
B. Permitted by law for the sake of social utility
C. Tolerated on condition that they pay regardless of any fault
D. Permitted with statutory safety measures
Answer: Option D
This Question Belongs to Law >> Law Of Torts
The 'tort of intimidation' was propounded in
A. Winterbottom v. Wright
B. Pasley v. Freeman
C. Winsmore v. Greenbank
D. Rookes v. Barnard
The maxim 'scienti non fit injuria' means
A. Where there is no fault, there is no remedy
B. Mere knowledge does not imply consent to take risk
C. Mere giving consent does not imply to take risk
D. Scientific knowledge is not enough to cause injury
A. Scott v. London & St. Katharine Docks Co.
B. Hedley Byrne Co. Ltd. v. Heller & Partners
C. Derry v. Peek
D. Cann v. Willson
A. Section 82 of the Evidence Act
B. Section 102 of the Evidence Act
C. Section 122 of the Evidence Act
D. Section 124 of the Evidence Act
asnwer is C
In the context of the Law of Torts and the principle established in M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, the answer cannot be D.
While it might seem logical that a dangerous activity is "permitted with safety measures," the legal definition of Absolute Liability specifically focuses on the financial responsibility that follows an accident, rather than the permission to operate.