In Mir Abdul Khalid v. Abdul Gaffar Sheriff & others, AIR 1985 SC 608, a suit for accounts against the retired partner filed beyond three years from the date of dissolution was held to be
A. Within limitation as the period of limitation for such a suit is 30 years
B. Within limitation as the period of limitation for such a suit is 12 years
C. Barred by limitation as the period of limitation for such a suit is six months
D. Barred by limitation as the period of limitation for such a suit is three years
Answer: Option D
Section 25 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, provides for
A. Liability of the firm for the acts of a partner
B. Liability of a partner for the acts of the firm
C. Liability of the firm for the wrongful acts of a partner
D. Rights of a partner
Where a partner is entitled to interest on the capital subscribed, such interest is payable
A. Out of profits only
B. Out of capital if no profits
C. Out of capital if losses
D. Either (A) or (B) or (C)
Section 44(g) of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, is to be regarded as
A. Independent of section 44(a) to 44(f) of the Act
B. Ejusdem generis with sections 44(a) to 44(f) of the Act
C. Either (A) or (B)
D. Only (A) and not (B)
A. Suit in respect of any transaction which forms an item of the partnership account
B. Suit for money lent by him to a firm of which he is a member
C. Suit for contributions in respect of moneys borrowed by him under an express agreement with them for the purposes of partnership
D. All the above
Join The Discussion