In Shreeram Finance Corporation v. Yasin Khan & Others, AIR 1989 SC 1764, it has been held that

A) Where there was a change in the constitution of the firm, a suit instituted after change in constitution, but before the change notified in the register, is not maintainable B) Where there was a change in the constitution of the firm, a suit instituted after the change but before the change notified in the register is maintainable, as the notifying change in the register shall relate back to the date of application for change C) The maintainability of a suit, where there was a change in the constitution of the firm, a suit instituted after the change but before the change notified in the register, shall be in the discretion of the court D) Both (B) and (C)

Answer & Solution

Correct Answer: Option A

Let's discuss the solution. Join the discussion

Question posted by Examveda

Community

Join the Discussion

Join the discussion

No comments yet Be the first to discuss this question.

Keep Learning

In Shreeram Finance Corporation v Yasin Khan & Others AIR 1989...

In Shreeram Finance Corporation v. Yasin Khan & Others, AIR 1989 SC 1764, it has been held that

Join the Discussion

Related Questions on Indian Partnership Act