In Shreeram Finance Corporation v. Yasin Khan & Others, AIR 1989 SC 1764, it has been held that
A. Where there was a change in the constitution of the firm, a suit instituted after change in constitution, but before the change notified in the register, is not maintainable
B. Where there was a change in the constitution of the firm, a suit instituted after the change but before the change notified in the register is maintainable, as the notifying change in the register shall relate back to the date of application for change
C. The maintainability of a suit, where there was a change in the constitution of the firm, a suit instituted after the change but before the change notified in the register, shall be in the discretion of the court
D. Both (B) and (C)
Answer: Option A
This Question Belongs to Law >> Indian Partnership Act
Section 25 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, provides for
A. Liability of the firm for the acts of a partner
B. Liability of a partner for the acts of the firm
C. Liability of the firm for the wrongful acts of a partner
D. Rights of a partner
Where a partner is entitled to interest on the capital subscribed, such interest is payable
A. Out of profits only
B. Out of capital if no profits
C. Out of capital if losses
D. Either (A) or (B) or (C)
Section 44(g) of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, is to be regarded as
A. Independent of section 44(a) to 44(f) of the Act
B. Ejusdem generis with sections 44(a) to 44(f) of the Act
C. Either (A) or (B)
D. Only (A) and not (B)
A. Suit in respect of any transaction which forms an item of the partnership account
B. Suit for money lent by him to a firm of which he is a member
C. Suit for contributions in respect of moneys borrowed by him under an express agreement with them for the purposes of partnership
D. All the above
Join The Discussion