In which case the Supreme Court held that power to grant interim measure under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 extends to International arbitration as well:
A. Bhatia International v. Bulk Trading S.A., (2002)4 SCC 105
B. Oil & Natural Gas Corpn. Ltd. v. Saw Pipes Ltd., (2003) 5 SCC 705
C. Konkan Rly. Corpn. Ltd. v. Rani Construction (P) Ltd., (2000) 8 SCC 159
D. Sundaram Finance Ltd. v. NEPC India Ltd., (1999) 2 SCC 479
Answer: Option A
Which of the Sections provide for the number of conciliations:
A. Section 63
B. Section 64
C. Section 65
D. Section 66
A. M.M.T.C. Ltd. v. Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd.
B. Sunderam Finance Ltd. v. N.E.P.C. Ltd.
C. Olympus Super structures Pvt. Ltd. v. Meera Vijay
D. Orma Impex Pvt. Ltd. v. Nissari Pvt. Ltd.
A. Is void and non-actionable
B. Is to be construed as being of reference of disputes to a sole arbitrator
C. Is to be construed as being of reference of disputes to three arbitrators
D. Is to be construed as being of reference of disputes to five arbitrators with the fifth arbitrator being nominated by the two arbitrators of each party
While considering the grant of interim measures, the Court may see whether:
A. The applicant has made prima facie case
B. The balance of convenience is in his favour
C. He would suffer irreparable injury if such measures are not granted
D. All of the above
Join The Discussion