In which of the fallowing case the Supreme Court held that the jurisprudential concept of negligence differs in civil and criminal laws; what may be negligence in civil law may not necessarily be negligence in criminal law.
A. Jacob Mathew v. State of Punjab, AIR 2005 SC 3180
B. Basavaraj v. Dhanalakshmi Finance Co. (R) Terdal, AIR 2010 SC 382
C. Sunil v. State of Haryana, AIR 2010 SC 392
D. None of the above
Answer: Option A
The 'tort of intimidation' was propounded in
A. Winterbottom v. Wright
B. Pasley v. Freeman
C. Winsmore v. Greenbank
D. Rookes v. Barnard
The maxim 'scienti non fit injuria' means
A. Where there is no fault, there is no remedy
B. Mere knowledge does not imply consent to take risk
C. Mere giving consent does not imply to take risk
D. Scientific knowledge is not enough to cause injury
A. Scott v. London & St. Katharine Docks Co.
B. Hedley Byrne Co. Ltd. v. Heller & Partners
C. Derry v. Peek
D. Cann v. Willson
A. Section 82 of the Evidence Act
B. Section 102 of the Evidence Act
C. Section 122 of the Evidence Act
D. Section 124 of the Evidence Act
Join The Discussion