In which of the following case would the Court not grant perpetual injunction when the defendant invades or threatens to invade the plaintiffs right to, or enjoyment of property?

A. Section 35 B. Section 36 C. Section 37 D. None of the above

A. Is granted by a decree B. Can be granted without notice to and hearing the defendant C. Can never be granted without notice to and hearing the defendant D. Can be granted on merits only

A. Necessary party B. Proper party C. Neither (A) nor (B) D. Both (A) and (C)

A. In a contract, where plaintiff has been given an unfair advantage over the defendant B. In a case where the contract is not enforceable at the instance of the other party C. Where the defendant entered into the contract under circumstances which though not rendering the contract voidable, makes it inequitable to enforce specific performance D. Where performance of the contract would involve some hardship on the defendant which he did not foresee, whereas its non-performance would involve no such hardship on the plaintiff