In which of the following cases it was held that Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code is constitutionally valid because there is presumption of constitutionality of an Act of Parliament?
A. Naz Foundation v. Government of NCT (2009) 111 DRJ 1
B. Suresh Kumar Kaushal v. Naz Foundation, (2014) 1 SCC 1
C. Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, Writ petition (criminal) no. 76 of 2016
D. K. S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, Writ petition (criminal) no. 494 of 2012
Answer: Option B
This Question Belongs to Law >> Indian Penal Code
Which of the following is an offence of continuing under Indian Penal Code, 1860?
A. Rape
B. Theft
C. Abetment
D. Abduction
Sexual intercourse by husband upon his wife during separation attracts a punishment of
A. Imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than 3 years but which may extend to 5 years and fine
B. Imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than 3 years but which may extend to 7 years and fine
C. Imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than 2 years but which may extend to 5 years and fine
D. Imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than 2 years but which may extend to 7 years and fine
Against whom among the following, the offence of abduction is committed?
A. Woman
B. Child below the age of 18 years
C. Child below the age of 12 years
D. Any person
A. Attempt to cause death
B. Causing death intentionally
C. Causing grievous injury
D. Causing injury which is likely to cause death
Join The Discussion