In which of the following cases it was held that Section...

Home / Law / Indian Penal Code / Question

Examveda

In which of the following cases it was held that Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code is constitutionally valid because there is presumption of constitutionality of an Act of Parliament?

A. Naz Foundation v. Government of NCT (2009) 111 DRJ 1

B. Suresh Kumar Kaushal v. Naz Foundation, (2014) 1 SCC 1

C. Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, Writ petition (criminal) no. 76 of 2016

D. K. S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, Writ petition (criminal) no. 494 of 2012

Answer: Option B

This Question Belongs to Law >> Indian Penal Code

Related Questions on Indian Penal Code

A. Rape

B. Theft

C. Abetment

D. Abduction

View Answer

A. Imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than 3 years but which may extend to 5 years and fine

B. Imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than 3 years but which may extend to 7 years and fine

C. Imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than 2 years but which may extend to 5 years and fine

D. Imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than 2 years but which may extend to 7 years and fine

View Answer

A. Woman

B. Child below the age of 18 years

C. Child below the age of 12 years

D. Any person

View Answer

A. Attempt to cause death

B. Causing death intentionally

C. Causing grievous injury

D. Causing injury which is likely to cause death

View Answer