ExamVeda
Login
Home
41
In which one of the following cases was it observed by the Supreme Court that precedent should not be petrified nor judicial dicta divorced from the socioeconomic mores of the age?
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option D
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
42
The watchword of a Parliamentary government is
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option D
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
43
Match List I with List II and select the correct answer:
List I (Power of President) List II (Relevant Constitutional Provision)
a. Power to grant pardon 1. Article 76
b. Executive power to the Union 2. Article 75
c. Power to appoint Prime Minister 3. Article 53
d. Appointment of Attorney General 4. Article 72
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option B
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
44
Point out the incorrect match-
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option A
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
45
The authority empowered to make laws in respect of matters not enumerated in any of three Lists are
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option B
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
46
The Law Commission of India in its 259th Report suggested for inclusion of a new Fundamental Right in the Constitution. Identify it from the following
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option B
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
47
"The State Government cannot avoid their constitutional obligation to provide free legal services to the poor accused by pleading financial or administrative inability"- Dealt in the case.
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option B
Solution:
The statement "The State Government cannot avoid their constitutional obligation to provide free legal services to the poor accused by pleading financial or administrative inability" was addressed in the case of Option B: Hussainara Khatoon v. State of Bihar. This landmark case dealt with the issue of providing free legal services to indigent (poor) accused persons who were unable to afford legal representation.

In this case, the Supreme Court of India held that the state government could not evade its constitutional duty to provide legal aid to financially disadvantaged individuals accused of crimes by citing financial or administrative constraints. The court emphasized that access to justice is a fundamental right and that the state must ensure that it is not denied to anyone due to their economic situation.

Therefore, the correct answer is Option B: Hussainara Khatoon v. State of Bihar. This case established important principles related to the provision of free legal services to the poor accused in India.
48
Which one of the followingis not correct?
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option A
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
49
An International treaty becomes binding on India, when:
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option C
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
50
Give correct response to
1. In India, judiciary is not the part of the State
2. In India, the pattern and designation of subordinate courts in the States are not uniform
3. Munsif courts have both civil and criminal jurisdiction
4. The pattern of subordinate courts in metropolitan areas is the same as that in district
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option C
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board