1. An, accused of murder, alleges that, by grave and sudden provocation, he was deprived of the power of self-control under Indian Evidence Act, the burden of proof is on
2. A' is charged with travelling on a railway without ticket, the burden of proving that 'A' had a ticket is on-
3. Queen Empress v. Abdullah is a leading case on
4. A 'Dying Declaration' to be admissible under Indian Evidence Act must be made before
5. Which of the statements is true?
Admission of a party
Admission of a party
6. Which of the following is a mismatch?
7. Which one of the following is a correct statement relating to cross examination?
8. Section 79 of Evidence Act applies to
9. Under Indian Evidence Act, 1872 which one of the following is not essential condition for admissibility of dying declaration?
10. What minimum number of witnesses are required to prove offence of dacoity in a trial?
Read More Section(Indian Evidence Act)
Each Section contains maximum 100 MCQs question on Indian Evidence Act. To get more questions visit other sections.
- Indian Evidence Act - Section 1
- Indian Evidence Act - Section 2
- Indian Evidence Act - Section 3
- Indian Evidence Act - Section 4
- Indian Evidence Act - Section 5
- Indian Evidence Act - Section 6
- Indian Evidence Act - Section 7
- Indian Evidence Act - Section 8
- Indian Evidence Act - Section 9
- Indian Evidence Act - Section 10
- Indian Evidence Act - Section 11
- Indian Evidence Act - Section 12
- Indian Evidence Act - Section 13
- Indian Evidence Act - Section 14
- Indian Evidence Act - Section 16
- Indian Evidence Act - Section 17
- Indian Evidence Act - Section 18
- Indian Evidence Act - Section 19