Specific Relief Act MCQ question and answer

1

As per Section 40 of the Specific Relief Act, where an instrument is evidence of different rights or different obligations the court may in a proper case-

A) Cancel it in part and allow it to stand for the residue B) Cancel it in whole C) Cannot cancel any part D) None of these

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option A

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

2

A suit under section 7 may be brought by a person

A) Who is not the owner of the property B) Who may not have the possession of the property C) From whose possession the goods may not have been removed D) Either (A), (B) or (C)

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option D

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

3

Under which of the following circumstances a court can grant perpetual injunction?

A) To prevent multiplicity of judicial proceedings B) When compensation in money would not afford adequate relief C) No standard for ascertaining actual damage exists D) All above

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option D

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

4

The parties which cannot be compelled to perform specific performances of contract are provided in which section of Specific Relief Act:

A) 27 B) 28 C) 29 D) 30

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option B

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

5

Section 41 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 lays down the cases in which perpetual injunction -

A) Can be granted B) Cannot the granted C) Both (A) and (B) D) Neilher (A) nor (B)

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option B

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

6

Plaintiff has filed the suit for only declaration of title, though he is not in possession of suit property. The suit is barred under which provision of Specific Relief Act, 1963?

A) Section 34 B) Section 35 C) Section 36 D) Section 37

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option A

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

7

A person is dispossessed of his immovable property without due course of law. In what period can he bring a suit for recovery of possession under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963?

A) Three months B) Six months C) Nine months D) One year

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option B

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

8

Under Section 12(2) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 part performance of a Contract can be enforced by

A) The promisor B) The promisee C) Both (A) and (B) D) None of the above

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option C

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

9

Contracts not specifically enforceable have been enumerated in:

A) Section 14 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 B) Section 13 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 C) Section 12 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 D) Section 15 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option A

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

10

The engagement diamond ring of 'N' was stolen by 'T', a thief who sold it to 'J' a jeweller. 'N' filed a suit for recovery of ring against 'J'. 'J' contended that he is ready to pay the price of the ring. Whether the decree for recovery of diamond ring can be refused on the ground that

A) Compensation in terms of money would be adequate relief for the loss of ring B) J' is bona fide purchaser of ring for consideration C) There is no jural relation between 'N' & 'J' D) None of these

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option D

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

Specific Relief Act MCQ question and answer | Law MCQ question