?
Match List I and List II and select the correct answer using the given below:
| List I |
List II |
| a. Rukia Khatun v. Abdul Laskar |
1. Divorced wife is entitled to Mahr, reasonable and fair provision for future. |
| b. Shayara Bano v. Union Of India |
2. Uncommunicated talaq is no talaq. |
| c. Shamim Ara v. State of Uttar Pradesh |
3. Triple Talaq is unconstitutional |
| d. Danial Latifi v. Union Of India |
4. Reconciliation should precede Talaq |
Answer & Solution
Correct Answer:
Option
A
Join the Discussion
Login to post a comment or share your explanation.
Login