Match List-I (Maxims) with List-II (Cases) and give correct answer by using given below:
| List I (Maxims) | List II (Cases) |
| a. Damnum sine injuria | 1. Padmavati v. Dugganika |
| b. Injuria sine damno | 2. Vishnu Datt v. Board of Higher Secondary and Intermediate Education, Uttar Pradesh |
| c. Volenti non fit injuria | 3. Bindra Devi Chauhan v. State of Himachal Pradesh |
| d. Res ipsa loquitor | 4. Bhim Singh v. State of Jammu and Kashmir |
A. a-2, b-4, c-3, d-1
B. a-2, b-3, c-1, d-4
C. a-2, b-4, c-1, d-3
D. a-1, b-2, c-4, d-3
Answer: Option C
This Question Belongs to Law >> Law Of Torts
The 'tort of intimidation' was propounded in
A. Winterbottom v. Wright
B. Pasley v. Freeman
C. Winsmore v. Greenbank
D. Rookes v. Barnard
The maxim 'scienti non fit injuria' means
A. Where there is no fault, there is no remedy
B. Mere knowledge does not imply consent to take risk
C. Mere giving consent does not imply to take risk
D. Scientific knowledge is not enough to cause injury
A. Scott v. London & St. Katharine Docks Co.
B. Hedley Byrne Co. Ltd. v. Heller & Partners
C. Derry v. Peek
D. Cann v. Willson
A. Section 82 of the Evidence Act
B. Section 102 of the Evidence Act
C. Section 122 of the Evidence Act
D. Section 124 of the Evidence Act
Join The Discussion