Match List-I (Name of case) with List-II (Decision of case) by using below:
| List I (Name of case) | List II (Decision of cases) |
| a. Manju Bhatia v. New Delhi Municipal Corporation | 1. Liability of owner of tree for an injury caused by its falling |
| b. Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Sushiia Devi | 2. Legal duty of Railway to assure reasonable safety at railway level crossing |
| c. Union of India v. Lalman | 3. Teacher's duty of case towards children when they are taken out on a picnic for fun and swim |
| d. M. S. Grewal v. Deepchand Sood | 4. Liability of builder towards purchasers of flats |
A. a-2, b-1, c-3, d-4
B. a-1, b-2, c-4, d-3
C. a-3, b-4, c-1, d-2
D. a-4, b-1, c-2, d-3
Answer: Option D
This Question Belongs to Law >> Law Of Torts
In the matter of Union of India V Lalman the issue was regarding "grant of compassionate allowance" and there was no issue regarding "safety at level crossing". Kindly look into the same and reconsider correcting the question please.
Regards
Tilak Singh V
tilaksinghv@gmail.com