Match List-I (name of case) with List-II (name of defense) and give the correct answer by using the given below:
| List I (Decided case) | List II (Principle stated) |
| a. Samira Kohli v. Prabha Manchanda | 1. Plaintiff a wrong-doer |
| b. Sodan Singh v. New Delhi Municipal Committee | 2. Leave and licence |
| c. Bird v. Holbrook | 3. Act of God |
| d. Kallulal v. Hemchand | 4. Necessity |
A. a-2, b-4, c-1, d-3
B. a-1, b-2, c-4, d-3
C. a-2, b-1, c-3, d-4
D. a-3, b-1, c-2, d-4
Answer: Option A
This Question Belongs to Law >> Law Of Torts
Sir,
In the case of Kallulal v. Hemchand the plea of 'res ipsa loquitur' was discussed, however, act of God was never pleaded. The matter resulted in conviction. Therefore, there seems to be error in the question itself. Kindly examine this.
Tilak Singh V
tilakinghv@gmail.com