ExamVeda
Login
Home

Match List-I (name of case) with List-II (name of defense) and...

This question belongs to Law Law Of Torts
Law of Torts
?

Match List-I (name of case) with List-II (name of defense) and give the correct answer by using the given below:
List I (Decided case) List II (Principle stated)
a. Samira Kohli v. Prabha Manchanda 1. Plaintiff a wrong-doer
b. Sodan Singh v. New Delhi Municipal Committee 2. Leave and licence
c. Bird v. Holbrook 3. Act of God
d. Kallulal v. Hemchand 4. Necessity

Answer & Solution
Correct Answer: Option A
Let's discuss the solution. Join the discussion
Examveda
Question posted by Examveda
Community

Join the Discussion

1 Comment
Tilak Singh
Tilak Singh 3 years ago
Sir,
In the case of Kallulal v. Hemchand the plea of 'res ipsa loquitur' was discussed, however, act of God was never pleaded. The matter resulted in conviction. Therefore, there seems to be error in the question itself. Kindly examine this.
Tilak Singh V
tilakinghv@gmail.com
Keep Learning

Related Questions on Law of Torts

The 'tort of intimidation' was propounded in
A. Winterbottom v. Wright B. Pasley v. Freeman C. Winsmore v. Greenbank D. Rookes v. Barnard
The maxim 'scienti non fit injuria' means
A. Where there is no fault, there is no remedy B. Mere knowledge does not imply consent to take risk C. Mere giving consent does not imply to take risk D. Scientific knowledge is not enough to cause injury
In which one of the following cases did the Court of Exchequer explain the principle of res ipsa loquitur?
A. Scott v. London & St. Katharine Docks Co. B. Hedley Byrne Co. Ltd. v. Heller & Partners C. Derry v. Peek D. Cann v. Willson
Communications addressed by a husband to his wife are not, except with his consent, admissible in evidence by virtue of
A. Section 82 of the Evidence Act B. Section 102 of the Evidence Act C. Section 122 of the Evidence Act D. Section 124 of the Evidence Act
More Related Questions on Law of Torts