Match List-I (Name of defence) with List-II (Related case) and give the answer by using the given below:
| List I | List II |
| a. Plaintiff a wrongdoer | 1. Nichols v. Marsland |
| b. Act of God | 2. Bird v. Holbrook |
| c. Inevitable accident | 3. Consolidated Co. v. Curtis |
| d. Mistake | 4. Stanley v. Powell |
A. a-4, b-3, c-2, d-1
B. a-3, b-4, c-1, d-2
C. a-2, b-1, c-4, d-3
D. a-1, b-2, c-3, d-4
Answer: Option C
This Question Belongs to Law >> Law Of Torts
The 'tort of intimidation' was propounded in
A. Winterbottom v. Wright
B. Pasley v. Freeman
C. Winsmore v. Greenbank
D. Rookes v. Barnard
The maxim 'scienti non fit injuria' means
A. Where there is no fault, there is no remedy
B. Mere knowledge does not imply consent to take risk
C. Mere giving consent does not imply to take risk
D. Scientific knowledge is not enough to cause injury
A. Scott v. London & St. Katharine Docks Co.
B. Hedley Byrne Co. Ltd. v. Heller & Partners
C. Derry v. Peek
D. Cann v. Willson
A. Section 82 of the Evidence Act
B. Section 102 of the Evidence Act
C. Section 122 of the Evidence Act
D. Section 124 of the Evidence Act
Join The Discussion