Match the items of List I (name of case) with the items of List II (related topic) and choose the correct answer from the given below.
| List I (Name of case) | List II (Related topic) |
| a. Jone v. Boyce | 1. Remoteness of damages |
| b. Scott v. Shepherd | 2. Medical negligence |
| c. A. H. Khodwa v. State of Maharashtra | 3. Nervous shock |
| d. Victorian Railway Commissioner v. Coultas | 4. Doctrine of alternative danger |
A. a-3, b-4, c-2, d-1
B. a-2, b-1, c-3, d-4
C. a-4, b-1, c-2, d-3
D. a-4, b-2, c-1, d-3
Answer: Option C
This Question Belongs to Law >> Law Of Torts
The 'tort of intimidation' was propounded in
A. Winterbottom v. Wright
B. Pasley v. Freeman
C. Winsmore v. Greenbank
D. Rookes v. Barnard
The maxim 'scienti non fit injuria' means
A. Where there is no fault, there is no remedy
B. Mere knowledge does not imply consent to take risk
C. Mere giving consent does not imply to take risk
D. Scientific knowledge is not enough to cause injury
A. Scott v. London & St. Katharine Docks Co.
B. Hedley Byrne Co. Ltd. v. Heller & Partners
C. Derry v. Peek
D. Cann v. Willson
A. Section 82 of the Evidence Act
B. Section 102 of the Evidence Act
C. Section 122 of the Evidence Act
D. Section 124 of the Evidence Act
Join The Discussion