?
Competitive Exams MCQs
Aptitude
English
Verbal Reasoning
Non Verbal Reasoning
General Knowledge(GK)
General Science(GS)
Data Interpretation(DI)
Banking Awareness
Current Affairs
Subject wise GK MCQs
General Knowledge(GK)
State Wise GK
History GK
Geography GK
Physics GK
Chemistry GK
Biology GK
Environmental Science GK
Computer Fundatmental MCQs
Computer Fundamentals
Microsoft Word
Microsoft Excel
MS Power Point
Tally
Operating System
Python
AI(Artificial Intelligence)
Join the Discussion
Login to post a comment or share your explanation.
LoginIt appears that there has been a small mess up in framing the question. There are two possibilities namely, one vicarious liability of employer and the other one is joint tort feasors when two individuals are working together on their own. Following cases will clarify the situation:
In Re Polemis & Furness, Withy & Co Ltd (1921) (Folemis Case)
The defendant stevedore's employees were loading cargo into a ship. An employee negligently caused a plank to fall into the ship's hold. The plank caused a spark, which ignited some petrol vapour in the hold, causing an explosion that resulted in the ship becoming a total loss.
The Court of Appeal held that a defendant can be deemed liable for all consequences flowing from his negligent conduct regardless of how unforeseeable such consequences are.
Century Insurance Co Ltd v Northern Ireland Road Transport Board, in which a petrol lorry driver tried to light a cigarette with a lit match while in a petrol station. After throwing the lit match onto the floor, there was an explosion and a fire. The employers were held liable, as the driver did the act in the course of carrying out his job of delivering the petrol. It was, however, an unauthorised way of doing what he was employed to do, but the employers were still vicariously liable for the damage caused.
In Brook v. Bool, A and B entered Z’s premises to search for an escape of gas. Each one of them, in turn, applied damage to Z’s premises in this case, even though the act of A alone had caused the explosion, but both A and B were considered to be joint tortfeasors and thus held liable for the damage.
Please look into the above and consider modifying the question or the suggested answer.
Regards