ExamVeda
Login
Home

Saroja was granted government land She was dispossessed without her consent...

This question belongs to Law Specific Relief Act
Specific Relief Act
?

Saroja was granted government land. She was dispossessed without her consent. She instituted suit against the government under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963, for recovering possession of the property. The court rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(D) of CPC (Code of Civil Procedure). Whether rejection is proper?

Answer & Solution
Correct Answer: Option A
Let's discuss the solution. Join the discussion
Examveda
Question posted by Examveda
Community

Join the Discussion

No comments yet Be the first to discuss this question.
Keep Learning

Related Questions on Specific Relief Act

Which section of the Specific Relief Act provides for grant of temporary and permanent injunctions:
A. Section 35 B. Section 36 C. Section 37 D. None of the above
Which of the following statements is wrong? Perpetual injunction
A. Is granted by a decree B. Can be granted without notice to and hearing the defendant C. Can never be granted without notice to and hearing the defendant D. Can be granted on merits only
Suit for specific performance is claimed when applicant is . . . . . . . . .
A. Necessary party B. Proper party C. Neither (A) nor (B) D. Both (A) and (C)
Point out - On which of the following ground the court shall not refuse the decree of specific performance.
A. In a contract, where plaintiff has been given an unfair advantage over the defendant B. In a case where the contract is not enforceable at the instance of the other party C. Where the defendant entered into the contract under circumstances which though not rendering the contract voidable, makes it inequitable to enforce specific performance D. Where performance of the contract would involve some hardship on the defendant which he did not foresee, whereas its non-performance would involve no such hardship on the plaintiff
More Related Questions on Specific Relief Act