The plaintiff's husband gave some cash and cheques to his friend who was an employee of a Bank, for depositing in her account in the bank. The employee misappropriated the amount. Choose the most appropriate answer from the following:
A. The Bank is not liable because at the time the person concerned was not acting as an employee
B. The Bank is liable because the master is liable for the misappropriation of his servant
C. The Bank is liable as the person concerned is its employee
D. The Bank is liable because the person concerned was given all those cash and cheques at the time when he was an employee of the Bank
Answer: Option A
This Question Belongs to Law >> Law Of Torts
The 'tort of intimidation' was propounded in
A. Winterbottom v. Wright
B. Pasley v. Freeman
C. Winsmore v. Greenbank
D. Rookes v. Barnard
The maxim 'scienti non fit injuria' means
A. Where there is no fault, there is no remedy
B. Mere knowledge does not imply consent to take risk
C. Mere giving consent does not imply to take risk
D. Scientific knowledge is not enough to cause injury
A. Scott v. London & St. Katharine Docks Co.
B. Hedley Byrne Co. Ltd. v. Heller & Partners
C. Derry v. Peek
D. Cann v. Willson
A. Section 82 of the Evidence Act
B. Section 102 of the Evidence Act
C. Section 122 of the Evidence Act
D. Section 124 of the Evidence Act
Join The Discussion