The principle of 'Res ipsa loquitur' was followed by the Supreme Court in the case of
A. Pushpabai v. Ranjit G & P. Co., AIR 1977 SC 1735
B. Chandra Mohan Tiwari v. State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 1992 SC 891
C. Union of India v. Tulsiram, AIR 1985 SC 1416
D. Kuldip Singh v. Govt. of N.C.T., AIR 2006 SC 2652
Answer: Option A
This Question Belongs to Law >> Law Of Torts
The 'tort of intimidation' was propounded in
A. Winterbottom v. Wright
B. Pasley v. Freeman
C. Winsmore v. Greenbank
D. Rookes v. Barnard
The maxim 'scienti non fit injuria' means
A. Where there is no fault, there is no remedy
B. Mere knowledge does not imply consent to take risk
C. Mere giving consent does not imply to take risk
D. Scientific knowledge is not enough to cause injury
A. Scott v. London & St. Katharine Docks Co.
B. Hedley Byrne Co. Ltd. v. Heller & Partners
C. Derry v. Peek
D. Cann v. Willson
A. Section 82 of the Evidence Act
B. Section 102 of the Evidence Act
C. Section 122 of the Evidence Act
D. Section 124 of the Evidence Act
Join The Discussion