The ship . . . . . , Robinson arrived on the Island.

explain clearly .

I think, "The sentence arrangement according to given below
Having been broken the ship, Robinson arrived on the island.

Plz explain I can't understand

I haven't been seen like this structure.
Please make it more clear. With regard

It has two sentences
2nd sentence is in simple past
so the first sentence could be in past perfect
so i thought
The Ship HAD BROKEN,Robinson arrived on the Island.
But this is'nt giving complete meaning.
The ship HAVING BEEN BROKEN,Robinson arrived on the island.
This seems more appropriate indicating the first sentence is already completed and explaing the reason for the second sentence

Why not "had been broken "
is correct..?

explain clearly .

“Having been” is the past participle form and used to emphasize that a first action has been completed before the second action begins. So, it is for the second part of the sentence where, firstly the Ship broke and then the Robinson arrived on the island.

I couldn't understand this
Because the second part of the sentence is already in past so first part should be past perfect means had been broken.
Isn't so?

i can not understand that you explained.

What structure did the sentence follow? Why it is not past perfect tense?

is sentence not completed with 'has broken'??????

The word the ship is an object is before the blank that is why it is a passive structure so I think the answer must be
having been broken

i can't understand explation of that question

I think so A or D is right answer, please explain how Having broken is roght

It is simple sentebce structure.

How having please explain