The ship . . . . . , Robinson arrived on the Island.
A. had been broken
B. having been broken
C. having broken
D. has broken
Answer: Option B
Solution (By Examveda Team)
The ship having been broken, Robinson arrived on the Island.In this sentence, the use of the participle phrase "having been broken" correctly describes an action that was completed before the main action (Robinson arriving on the island). It indicates that the ship had already been broken before Robinson arrived.
Option A: had been broken is incorrect because it requires a different sentence structure, like "The ship had been broken when Robinson arrived on the island."
Option C: having broken is incorrect because it suggests that the ship itself broke something, which is not the intended meaning.
Option D: has broken is incorrect because it indicates a present perfect tense, which doesn't fit the sequence of events where the ship breaking happened before Robinson's arrival.
Conclusion: The correct answer is Option B: having been broken, as it properly conveys the sequence of events where the ship had already been broken before Robinson arrived.
This Question Belongs to Competitive English >> Grammar
Join The Discussion
Comments (20)
Related Questions on Grammar
A. had been broken
Full sentence: The ship had been broken, Romin arrived on the island.
Explanation:
"had been broken" – This is the past perfect passive form, which correctly shows that the ship was already broken before Romin arrived.
The past perfect tense ("had been...") is used to show that one past event happened before another past event.
Why the others are incorrect:
B. having been broken – grammatically possible, but awkward and not natural here as it sounds like it's modifying Romin.
C. having broken – this would mean Romin broke the ship, which changes the meaning.
D. has broken – present perfect tense, but the sentence is about past events.
Why they are using present and past tenses?I think,It is more suitable to use past indefinite and past perfect tense in the given sentence!
حضرتك السفينة مفرد يعني المفروض hasلو سمحتم راجعوا السؤال تاني
explain clearly .
I think, "The sentence arrangement according to given below
Having been broken the ship, Robinson arrived on the island.
Plz explain I can't understand
I haven't been seen like this structure.
Please make it more clear. With regard
It has two sentences
2nd sentence is in simple past
so the first sentence could be in past perfect
so i thought
The Ship HAD BROKEN,Robinson arrived on the Island.
But this is'nt giving complete meaning.
The ship HAVING BEEN BROKEN,Robinson arrived on the island.
This seems more appropriate indicating the first sentence is already completed and explaing the reason for the second sentence
Why not "had been broken "
is correct..?
explain clearly .
“Having been” is the past participle form and used to emphasize that a first action has been completed before the second action begins. So, it is for the second part of the sentence where, firstly the Ship broke and then the Robinson arrived on the island.
I couldn't understand this
Because the second part of the sentence is already in past so first part should be past perfect means had been broken.
Isn't so?
i can not understand that you explained.
What structure did the sentence follow? Why it is not past perfect tense?
is sentence not completed with 'has broken'??????
The word the ship is an object is before the blank that is why it is a passive structure so I think the answer must be
having been broken
i can't understand explation of that question
I think so A or D is right answer, please explain how Having broken is roght
It is simple sentebce structure.
How having please explain