The Supreme Court in Banarasi Dass v. Kaushi Ram, AIR 1958 SC 1165, has held that
A. Filing of plaint in a suit for dissolution by one partner and service of summons thereof, amounts to notice of intention to dissolve a partnership at will
B. Filing of a plaint in a suit for dissolution by one partner and service of summons thereof is does not amount to 'notice of intention to dissolve', a partnership at will
C. Filing of a plaint in a suit for dissolution by one partner and service of summons thereof may amount to notice of intention to dissolve a partnership at will
D. Either (B) or (C)
Answer: Option B
This Question Belongs to Law >> Indian Partnership Act
Section 25 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, provides for
A. Liability of the firm for the acts of a partner
B. Liability of a partner for the acts of the firm
C. Liability of the firm for the wrongful acts of a partner
D. Rights of a partner
Where a partner is entitled to interest on the capital subscribed, such interest is payable
A. Out of profits only
B. Out of capital if no profits
C. Out of capital if losses
D. Either (A) or (B) or (C)
Section 44(g) of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, is to be regarded as
A. Independent of section 44(a) to 44(f) of the Act
B. Ejusdem generis with sections 44(a) to 44(f) of the Act
C. Either (A) or (B)
D. Only (A) and not (B)
A. Suit in respect of any transaction which forms an item of the partnership account
B. Suit for money lent by him to a firm of which he is a member
C. Suit for contributions in respect of moneys borrowed by him under an express agreement with them for the purposes of partnership
D. All the above
Join The Discussion