What was the rule laid down by the Privy Council in "Wagon Mound" case?
A. The defendant is liable only for that injury which could be reasonably foreseen as occurring due to defendant's fault
B. The defendant is liable for all the injuries which occur as a direct consequence of defendant fault
C. The defendant is not liable, unless the plaintiff proves that he suffered injuries due to defendant's negligence
D. The defendant is not liable if he proves that the plaintiff suffered injury owing to his contributory negligence
Answer: Option A
This Question Belongs to Law >> Law Of Torts
The 'tort of intimidation' was propounded in
A. Winterbottom v. Wright
B. Pasley v. Freeman
C. Winsmore v. Greenbank
D. Rookes v. Barnard
The maxim 'scienti non fit injuria' means
A. Where there is no fault, there is no remedy
B. Mere knowledge does not imply consent to take risk
C. Mere giving consent does not imply to take risk
D. Scientific knowledge is not enough to cause injury
A. Scott v. London & St. Katharine Docks Co.
B. Hedley Byrne Co. Ltd. v. Heller & Partners
C. Derry v. Peek
D. Cann v. Willson
A. Section 82 of the Evidence Act
B. Section 102 of the Evidence Act
C. Section 122 of the Evidence Act
D. Section 124 of the Evidence Act
Join The Discussion