Whether in a suit for specific performance of contract to transfer immovable property, burden of proof is on the plaintiff to prove that the breach of contract can not be adequately relieved by compensation in money?

A. Section 35 B. Section 36 C. Section 37 D. None of the above

A. Is granted by a decree B. Can be granted without notice to and hearing the defendant C. Can never be granted without notice to and hearing the defendant D. Can be granted on merits only

A. Necessary party B. Proper party C. Neither (A) nor (B) D. Both (A) and (C)

A. In a contract, where plaintiff has been given an unfair advantage over the defendant B. In a case where the contract is not enforceable at the instance of the other party C. Where the defendant entered into the contract under circumstances which though not rendering the contract voidable, makes it inequitable to enforce specific performance D. Where performance of the contract would involve some hardship on the defendant which he did not foresee, whereas its non-performance would involve no such hardship on the plaintiff