Which of the following cannot pertain to the tort of nuisance?
A. Playing music through loudspeaker in the night
B. Creation of foul smell on one's land which reaches neighbour's residence
C. Construction of a flour mill on the ground floor, while the first floor is occupied by a tenant
D. Taking cattle on the field of the neighbour
Answer: Option D
Solution (By Examveda Team)
This question asks us to identify which action is NOT an example of nuisance in tort law.Let's break down each option:
Option A: Playing music through loudspeaker in the night: This CAN be a nuisance. Loud noise at unreasonable hours can disrupt the peace and quiet of neighbors, interfering with their enjoyment of their property.
Option B: Creation of foul smell on one's land which reaches neighbour's residence: This CAN be a nuisance. Unpleasant smells drifting onto neighboring properties can significantly interfere with their comfort and enjoyment.
Option C: Construction of a flour mill on the ground floor, while the first floor is occupied by a tenant: This CAN be a nuisance. The noise and vibrations from a flour mill could disturb the tenant upstairs. This affects the tenants peaceful enjoyment.
Option D: Taking cattle on the field of the neighbour: This is NOT typically considered nuisance. It's a direct physical trespass to land. Nuisance generally involves an indirect interference with someone's use or enjoyment of their land. Taking cattle onto someone else's field is a direct act of trespass.
Therefore, the correct answer is Option D. It's an example of trespass, not nuisance.
Join The Discussion
Comments (1)
The 'tort of intimidation' was propounded in
A. Winterbottom v. Wright
B. Pasley v. Freeman
C. Winsmore v. Greenbank
D. Rookes v. Barnard
The maxim 'scienti non fit injuria' means
A. Where there is no fault, there is no remedy
B. Mere knowledge does not imply consent to take risk
C. Mere giving consent does not imply to take risk
D. Scientific knowledge is not enough to cause injury
A. Scott v. London & St. Katharine Docks Co.
B. Hedley Byrne Co. Ltd. v. Heller & Partners
C. Derry v. Peek
D. Cann v. Willson
A. Section 82 of the Evidence Act
B. Section 102 of the Evidence Act
C. Section 122 of the Evidence Act
D. Section 124 of the Evidence Act

Reason for answer