Which of the following is not held to be misconduct within the meaning of section 44(c) of the Act, warranting an order of dissolution of a firm by the court
A. Committing adultery with several women in the city where the business was carried on by the firm, by a partner of the firm engaged in banking
B. Committing adultery with the wife of a fellow partner
C. Conviction for travelling without ticket
D. Misconduct towards the clients of the firm
Answer: Option A
This Question Belongs to Law >> Indian Partnership Act
Section 25 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, provides for
A. Liability of the firm for the acts of a partner
B. Liability of a partner for the acts of the firm
C. Liability of the firm for the wrongful acts of a partner
D. Rights of a partner
Where a partner is entitled to interest on the capital subscribed, such interest is payable
A. Out of profits only
B. Out of capital if no profits
C. Out of capital if losses
D. Either (A) or (B) or (C)
Section 44(g) of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, is to be regarded as
A. Independent of section 44(a) to 44(f) of the Act
B. Ejusdem generis with sections 44(a) to 44(f) of the Act
C. Either (A) or (B)
D. Only (A) and not (B)
A. Suit in respect of any transaction which forms an item of the partnership account
B. Suit for money lent by him to a firm of which he is a member
C. Suit for contributions in respect of moneys borrowed by him under an express agreement with them for the purposes of partnership
D. All the above
Join The Discussion