A sues B, a manager appointed by the court in an administration suit, for a declaration, that he had validly surrendered his lease. B's defence is that the suit was not maintainable for want of notice under section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure and that the surrender was not valid. The court of first instance decided both the issues against A. B then sued A for royalty due under that lease.
A. The finding in the former suit that the lease was not validity surrendered was maintainable in spite of notice under section 80
B. The finding in the former suit that the lease was a validity surrendered but not maintainable for want of notice under section 80
C. The finding in the former suit that the lease was not validity surrendered was not maintainable for want of notice under section 80
D. None of these
Answer: Option C
This Question Belongs to Law >> Code Of Civil Procedure
Under Order 8 Rule 6 Code of Civil Procedure set-off may be permitted if-
A. The suit is for recovery of property
B. Set-off claimed by the defendant is ascertained sum of money
C. Value of property recoverable is less than rupees two lacs
D. Defendant presents a written statement of the suit
A. Is barred under all circumstances
B. Is not barred at all
C. Can be filed with the leave of the court
D. Either B or C
A. Such property actually received or might have received together with interest
B. Property actually received including profits due to improvements made by such person
C. Such property actually received or might have received but without any interest on such profits
D. Such property actually received
Join The Discussion