Under Order 8 Rule 6 Code of Civil Procedure set-off may be permitted if-
A. The suit is for recovery of property
B. Set-off claimed by the defendant is ascertained sum of money
C. Value of property recoverable is less than rupees two lacs
D. Defendant presents a written statement of the suit
Answer: Option B
Solution (By Examveda Team)
Order 8 Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) deals with set-off.A set-off is a right of a defendant to reduce the amount claimed by the plaintiff by deducting a debt owed to the defendant by the plaintiff. It's essentially a counterclaim, but limited to monetary claims.
Option B is correct: Set-off may be permitted if the set-off claimed by the defendant is an ascertained sum of money. Order 8 Rule 6 specifically allows set-offs where the defendant's claim against the plaintiff is for a specific, clearly defined amount of money. The amount must be readily calculable and not subject to dispute regarding its existence or quantification.
Option A is incorrect: A suit for the recovery of property doesn't automatically bar a set-off. While a set-off typically involves monetary claims, the CPC doesn't explicitly exclude set-offs in property recovery suits if a counterclaim involving a specific monetary debt exists.
Option C is incorrect: The value of the property recoverable is irrelevant to the applicability of Order 8 Rule 6. The rule focuses on the nature of the defendant's counterclaim (an ascertained sum of money), not the value of the plaintiff's claim.
Option D is incorrect: While a written statement is generally required from the defendant, the filing of a written statement itself doesn't determine the permissibility of a set-off. The key factor is whether the defendant's claim is an ascertained sum of money as per Order 8 Rule 6.
Under Order 8 Rule 6 Code of Civil Procedure set-off may be permitted if-
A. The suit is for recovery of property
B. Set-off claimed by the defendant is ascertained sum of money
C. Value of property recoverable is less than rupees two lacs
D. Defendant presents a written statement of the suit
A. Is barred under all circumstances
B. Is not barred at all
C. Can be filed with the leave of the court
D. Either B or C
A. Such property actually received or might have received together with interest
B. Property actually received including profits due to improvements made by such person
C. Such property actually received or might have received but without any interest on such profits
D. Such property actually received

Join The Discussion