A' supplies goods from Delhi to 'B' at Mumbai under a contract which provides "Courts in Mumbai would have jurisdiction to deal with disputes arising out of this agreement." 'A' sues 'B' in a Court at Delhi for the outstanding balance.
A. The Court would not admit the Plaint owing to the jurisdiction clause in the contract
B. The suit would be admitted and only if 'B' raises an objection to jurisdiction at Delhi would the Court determine the same
C. B' can prefer an appeal against the order of admission of the suit in the court at Delhi
D. B' can approach the Delhi High Court for transfer under section 24 Code of Civil Procedure
Answer: Option B
Join The Discussion