Dhulabhai etc. v. State of Madhya Pradesh and another, AIR 1969 SC 78, lays down certain principles regarding the exclusion of jurisdiction of civil courts. Which of the following is not a principle laid down:

A) Where a statute gives a finality to the orders of the special tribunals, the civil courts jurisdiction must be held to be excluded if there is adequate remedy to do what the civil court would normally do in a suit B) Where there is an express bar of jurisdiction of the court, an examination of the scheme of the particular Act to find out the adequacy or sufficiency of the remedies provided may be relevant but is not decisive to sustain the jurisdiction of the civil court C) Questions as to the correctness of the assessment apart from its constitutionality are the decisions of the authorities and a civil suit lies even if the orders of the authorities are declared to be final D) None of the above

Answer & Solution

Correct Answer: Option C

Let's discuss the solution. Join the discussion

Question posted by Examveda

Community

Join the Discussion

Join the discussion

No comments yet Be the first to discuss this question.

Keep Learning

Dhulabhai etc v State of Madhya Pradesh and another AIR 1969...

Dhulabhai etc. v. State of Madhya Pradesh and another, AIR 1969 SC 78, lays down certain principles regarding the exclusion of jurisdiction of civil courts. Which of the following is not a principle laid down:

Join the Discussion

Related Questions on Code of Civil Procedure