In which case the Supreme Court held that section 100A of Code of Civil Procedure which is substituted by Code of Civil Procedure Amendment Act, 2002 will not have retrospective effect even though it brings within its fold those appeals preferred prior to coming into force of the said Amendment Act.
A. M. George v. State of Kerala, AIR 2007 SC 1034
B. Jagjit Singh v. State of Haryana, AIR 2007 SC 59
C. Meetu v. State of Punjab, AIR 2007 SC 758
D. Kamla Devi v. Khushal Kanuiar, AIR 2007 SC 663
Answer: Option D
Under Order 8 Rule 6 Code of Civil Procedure set-off may be permitted if-
A. The suit is for recovery of property
B. Set-off claimed by the defendant is ascertained sum of money
C. Value of property recoverable is less than rupees two lacs
D. Defendant presents a written statement of the suit
A. Is barred under all circumstances
B. Is not barred at all
C. Can be filed with the leave of the court
D. Either B or C
A. Such property actually received or might have received together with interest
B. Property actually received including profits due to improvements made by such person
C. Such property actually received or might have received but without any interest on such profits
D. Such property actually received
Join The Discussion