ExamVeda
Login
Home
71
Specific Relief Act:- Plaintiff, without having any title, filed a suit, for permanent injunction against dispossession, based on long possession;
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option B
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
72
Section 42 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 provides for
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option A
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
73
In a case in which time had not been fixed for performance of the agreement, the court refused to grant the relief of specific performance to the plaintiff on the ground that suit was not filed within a reasonable time. The order is:
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option C
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
74
Section 26 of the Specific Relief Act contains the provision regarding:
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option C
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
75
An order allowing the prayer of injunction should ensure that
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option D
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
76
Which declaration can be granted by the Civil Court under Section 34 of Specific Relief Act, 1963?
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option D
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
77
Mistake contemplated under Section 26 of the Specific Relief Act is:
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option D
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
78
Under Section 6(2)(a) of the Specific Relief Act, no suit shall be brought after expiry of what period from the dispossession
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option A
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
79
Where applicant neither necessary nor proper party in suit of specific performance whether his presence is necessary for effective adjudication?
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option B
Solution:
Specific Performance: This is when someone asks the court to force another person to fulfill a contract (usually to buy or sell property).
Necessary Party: A person who must be included in a lawsuit because the court cannot make a proper decision without them. If they are missing, the case can't move forward.
Proper Party: A person who should be included in a lawsuit because their involvement could help the court make a better decision, but the case can still proceed without them.
Applicant: The person applying to be part of the lawsuit.

The question tells us the applicant is neither necessary nor proper. This means their presence isn't crucial for a fair and complete decision. Therefore, they don't need to be part of the suit.

Therefore, the correct answer is B: No
80
A perpetual injunction is granted to the plaintiff
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option C
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board