ExamVeda
Login
Home
71
No doubt, Ammu . . . . . . . . her mother.
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option B
Solution:
'takes after' somebody [no passive] (not used in the progressive tenses) means to look or behave like an older member of your family, especially your mother or father.
72
He . . . . . . . . for you all day. He's still waiting now.
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option C
Solution:
Definition:
The sentence describes an action that started in the past and is still continuing in the present. This situation requires the use of the present perfect continuous tense, which is formed using "has/have been + verb-ing". Correct Answer:
The correct option is Option C: has been waiting. Explanation:
- The phrase "He's still waiting now" indicates that the action is ongoing.
- The present perfect continuous tense is used for actions that started in the past and are still happening in the present.
- The correct structure is: Subject + has been + verb-ing.
- Therefore, the correct sentence is: He has been waiting for you all day. He's still waiting now.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
- Option A: waited → Incorrect because "waited" is in the past simple tense, which suggests the action is completed. However, the sentence indicates that the action is still ongoing.
- Option B: has waited → Incorrect because the present perfect tense ("has waited") is used for completed actions that have relevance to the present, but it does not emphasize the continuous nature of the action.
- Option D: had waited → Incorrect because "had waited" is in the past perfect tense, which is used when referring to an action that was completed before another past action. However, this sentence refers to an action that is still ongoing.
Final Answer: Option C: has been waiting.
73
. . . . . . . . to the White Rann of Kuchch recently?
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option B
Solution:
Question Explanation:
This question tests your understanding of the present perfect tense. The present perfect tense is used to describe actions that happened at an unspecified time in the past, or actions that started in the past and continue to the present.

Defining the Present Perfect Tense:
The present perfect tense is formed using the auxiliary verb "have" (or "has" for singular third-person subjects) + the past participle of the main verb. For example: "I have eaten," "She has gone." The key is that it connects the past to the present, often implying a relevance or impact on the present situation.

Analyzing the Options:
Option A: Are you ever... This is grammatically incorrect. "Are you ever" is a present simple tense question, which is inappropriate for asking about an event that took place at some point in the past.

Option B: Have you ever been... This is the correct answer. "Have you ever been" is the present perfect tense, correctly reflecting a past action with potential relevance to the present (e.g., the speaker might be curious about the person's experience). The question focuses on the experience of having visited the White Rann of Kuchch, regardless of when precisely that visit occurred. The "ever" adds emphasis on any time in the person's past.

Option C: Did you ever have... This option is incorrect. While "did" forms a past simple question, "have" as the main verb doesn't fit the context. "Have" in this context is not appropriate to describe the act of visiting a place. It suggests possession or experience, but not a physical visit.

Option D: Have you ever... This is grammatically correct but incomplete. It needs the past participle of the verb "to be" ("been") to correctly form the present perfect tense question. Therefore, it's not a complete or correct sentence. "Have you ever been to the White Rann of Kuchch?" is the grammatically correct and appropriate phrase.

Conclusion:
Only Option B: Have you ever been correctly uses the present perfect tense to ask about a past visit to a location, making it the most suitable and grammatically sound option.
74
He has been living in Switzerland . . . . . . . . two years.
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option C
Solution:
The preposition 'for' is used to denote a specific amount of time in which someone or something was performing an action. For example, 'I have been looking for my dog for some time now.' Here, 'for some time now' represents not an exact but particular amount of time. The word 'since', on the other hand, refers to a particular point of time from when the action started/began in the past to the present. It indicates that the action is continuing. For example, 'Raj has been living in London since 2003.'
Here are a few more examples to help you understand how the two prepositions are used.
Bruce has been travelling for the past two weeks.
Neethu will be here for a few hours.
I have known you since you were a kid.
Shanti has been working as a content writer since 2018.
75
I . . . . . . . . certainly do it.
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option C
Solution:
use 'will' for affirmative and negative sentences about the future. Use 'will' for requests too. If you want to make an offer or suggestion with I/we, use 'shall' in the question form. For very formal statements, especially to describe obligations, use 'shall'.
76
I will have to study very hard, . . . . . . . . I can pass the exam.
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option D
Solution:
We use 'so that' and 'in order that' to talk about purpose. We often use them with modal verbs (can, would, will, etc.). 'So that' is far more common than 'in order that', and 'in order that' is more formal.
77
Mary . . . . . . . . seats for us.
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option B
Solution:
Definition:
The sentence suggests a recommendation or duty regarding saving seats. The correct verb choice should indicate an obligation or advisability. Both "ought to" and "should" are modal verbs used to express advice or recommendations. Correct Answer:
The correct option is Option B: should save. Explanation:
- "Should" is a modal verb used to give advice, make recommendations, or express duty.
- In this sentence, "should save" means that it is advisable or expected for Mary to save seats for us.
- The correct sentence is: Mary should save seats for us.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
- Option A: ought to save → Although "ought to" is similar to "should," it is less commonly used in modern English and sounds slightly more formal.
- Option C: would have saved → Incorrect because "would have saved" is in the past perfect conditional, which is used when referring to something that did not actually happen in the past.
- Option D: would save → Incorrect because "would save" is used in conditional sentences, often depending on another action (e.g., "Mary would save seats if she arrived early").
Final Answer: Option B: should save.
78
The sky is clear, it . . . . . . . . rain today.
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option B
Solution:
Both 'may' and 'might' are used to express the possibility of some future action: 'might' is more tentative than 'may'.
79
Yesterday my brother . . . . . . . . a car.
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option C
Solution:
'yesterday' means past tense hence 'purchased' is the right answer.
80
My mother . . . . . . . . up early in the morning.
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option B
Solution:
The simple present tense form of the verb 'get' is used in the above sentence.
A simple Present Tense is a form of the verb used when an action is taking place in the present time or happens regularly.