Directions Each of the following question consists of a statement followed...

Home / Competitive Reasoning / Statement And Arguments / Question
Examveda
Examveda

Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.

Statement : Should luxury hotels be banned in India?

Arguments :
I. Yes. They are places from where international criminals operate.
II. No. Affluent foreign tourists will have no place to stay.

A. Only argument I is strong

B. Only argument II is strong

C. Either I or II is strong

D. Neither I nor II is strong

E. Both I and II are strong

Answer: Option B

Solution(By Examveda Team)

Clearly, the luxury hotels are a mark of country's standard and a place for staying for the affluent foreign tourists. So, argument II holds. Argument I is not a strong reason because ban on hotels is not a way to do away with the activities of international criminals.

This Question Belongs to Competitive Reasoning >> Statement And Arguments

Join The Discussion

Related Questions on Statement And Arguments

Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.

Statement : Should number of holidays of government employees be reduced ?

Arguments :
I. Yes, our government employees are having maximum number of holidays among the other countries of the world.
II. Yes, it will lead to increased productivity of government offices.

A. Only argument I is strong.

B. Only Argument II is strong.

C. Either I or II is strong.

D. Neither I nor II is strong.

E. Both I and II are strong.

  View Answer

Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.

Statement : Should there be a complete ban on manufacture of fire-crackers in India ?

Arguments :
I. No, this will render thousands of workers jobless.
II. Yes, the fire-cracker manufacture use child labour to a large extent.

A. Only argument I is strong.

B. Only Argument II is strong.

C. Either I or II is strong.

D. Neither I nor II is strong.

E. Both I and II are strong.

  View Answer

Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.

Statement : Should election expenses to Central and State legislatures be met by the government ?

Arguments :
I. Yes, it will put an end to political corruption.
II. No, it is not used in any country.

A. Only argument I is strong.

B. Only Argument II is strong.

C. Either I or II is strong.

D. Neither I nor II is strong.

E. Both I and II are strong.

  View Answer

Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.

Statement : Should the retirement age for academicians be raised to 65 years ?

Arguments :
I. No, this will be unfair to the non-academicians having lower age limit for retirement.
II. Yes, experienced academicians can greatly contribute to the nation's intellectual property.

A. Only argument I is strong.

B. Only Argument II is strong.

C. Either I or II is strong.

D. Neither I nor II is strong.

E. Both I and II are strong.

  View Answer

Read More: MCQ Type Questions and Answers