ExamVeda
Login
Home

Directions Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments...

This question belongs to Competitive Reasoning Statement And Arguments
Statement And Arguments
?

Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.

Statement : Should administrative officers be transferred after one or two years?

Arguments :
I. Yes. They get friendly with local people and are manipulated by them.
II. No. By the time their policies and schemes start taking shape, they have to leave.
III. No. This will create a lot of administrative hassles and cause a lot of inconvenience to the officers.

Answer & Solution
Correct Answer: Option C
Clearly, the acquaintance of administrative officers with the local people poses no harm. So, argument I is vague. However, both II and III hold strong, because making transfers too often would neither give them enough time to settle down comfortably in a new place, nor enable them to formulate and implement their policies in toto. This would also be administratively impossible.
Examveda
Question posted by Examveda
Community

Join the Discussion

No comments yet Be the first to discuss this question.
Keep Learning

Related Questions on Statement And Arguments

Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.

Statement : Should number of holidays of government employees be reduced ?

Arguments :
I. Yes, our government employees are having maximum number of holidays among the other countries of the world.
II. Yes, it will lead to increased productivity of government offices.
A. Only argument I is strong. B. Only Argument II is strong. C. Either I or II is strong. D. Neither I nor II is strong. E. Both I and II are strong.
Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.

Statement : Should there be a complete ban on manufacture of fire-crackers in India ?

Arguments :
I. No, this will render thousands of workers jobless.
II. Yes, the fire-cracker manufacture use child labour to a large extent.
A. Only argument I is strong. B. Only Argument II is strong. C. Either I or II is strong. D. Neither I nor II is strong. E. Both I and II are strong.
Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.

Statement : Should election expenses to Central and State legislatures be met by the government ?

Arguments :
I. Yes, it will put an end to political corruption.
II. No, it is not used in any country.
A. Only argument I is strong. B. Only Argument II is strong. C. Either I or II is strong. D. Neither I nor II is strong. E. Both I and II are strong.
Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.

Statement : Should the retirement age for academicians be raised to 65 years ?

Arguments :
I. No, this will be unfair to the non-academicians having lower age limit for retirement.
II. Yes, experienced academicians can greatly contribute to the nation's intellectual property.
A. Only argument I is strong. B. Only Argument II is strong. C. Either I or II is strong. D. Neither I nor II is strong. E. Both I and II are strong.
More Related Questions on Statement And Arguments