1. The principle of proximity of crime under criminal law is irrelevant, while deciding the liability for the offence of
2. Consider the following statements:
To constitute abetmentit is
1. Necessary that the act abetted must be committed.
2. Not necessary that the act abetted must be committed.
3. Necessary that the person abetted must have the same intention or knowledge as that of the abettor.
Which of the statement given above represent(s) the correct position of law?
To constitute abetmentit is
1. Necessary that the act abetted must be committed.
2. Not necessary that the act abetted must be committed.
3. Necessary that the person abetted must have the same intention or knowledge as that of the abettor.
Which of the statement given above represent(s) the correct position of law?
3. Match the appropriate statements with that of its authors:
List I
List II
a. The behaviour as criminal is part of the political process
1. Klare H. J.
b. Disobedience of law may be termed as a crime
2. Huda
c. Crime is not absolute like sin
3. Terence Morris
d. Crime is an act committed or omitted in violation of a public law
4. Blackstone
List I | List II |
a. The behaviour as criminal is part of the political process | 1. Klare H. J. |
b. Disobedience of law may be termed as a crime | 2. Huda |
c. Crime is not absolute like sin | 3. Terence Morris |
d. Crime is an act committed or omitted in violation of a public law | 4. Blackstone |
4. In cases where the act involves a specific mens rea, in cases of intoxication under section 86 of Indian Penal Code
5. Z under the influence of madness attempts to kill A.
6. The offence of 'extortion' cannot be committed against which of the following:
7. Which one of the following Offences described under the Indian Penal Code may be compounded by the person mentioned in the third column of the table given in Section 320(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973?
8. Punishment for disclosure of identity of victim of rape is provided under which of the following provision of Indian Penal Code
9. The case of Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab is concerned with-
10. Voyeurism for second or subsequent conviction attracts a punishment of
Read More Section(Indian Penal Code)
Each Section contains maximum 100 MCQs question on Indian Penal Code. To get more questions visit other sections.
- Indian Penal Code - Section 1
- Indian Penal Code - Section 2
- Indian Penal Code - Section 3
- Indian Penal Code - Section 4
- Indian Penal Code - Section 5
- Indian Penal Code - Section 6
- Indian Penal Code - Section 7
- Indian Penal Code - Section 8
- Indian Penal Code - Section 9
- Indian Penal Code - Section 10
- Indian Penal Code - Section 11
- Indian Penal Code - Section 12
- Indian Penal Code - Section 13
- Indian Penal Code - Section 14
- Indian Penal Code - Section 15
- Indian Penal Code - Section 16
- Indian Penal Code - Section 17
- Indian Penal Code - Section 18
- Indian Penal Code - Section 19
- Indian Penal Code - Section 20
- Indian Penal Code - Section 21
- Indian Penal Code - Section 22
- Indian Penal Code - Section 24
- Indian Penal Code - Section 25
- Indian Penal Code - Section 26
- Indian Penal Code - Section 27
- Indian Penal Code - Section 28