Indian Penal Code MCQ question and answer | Law MCQ question

Whoever causes death of a person by rash or negligent act not amounting to murder is liable to be punished with

A' handed over his watch to a watchsmith for repairing. In order to not pay the repairing charges 'A' picked up his watch from the shop, when the watchsmith was not looking. In this case

Consider the following statement:
Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code does not apply where:
1. Five or more person assembled where one killed A
2. A and B who are enemies of C decided distinctly of kill C. A killed C when B was also present
3. The presence of any person, who participated in the pre-arranged plan, is not necessary at the time of actual commission of the crime
4. Privity of mind of all the accused is an essential ingredient for the commission of crime of these statements:

What amounts to grave and sudden provocation in a given case is:

Abettor is a person

Under section 82 of The Indian Penal Code, which is the age of a child under which the act done by it, is not an offence?

X, with the intention to kill Y, supplies him a poisoned apple. Y discovers that the apple is poisoned and gives it to a minor child to eat. The child eats it and dies. In this case:

Match the following:

List I	List II
a. Culpable homicide	1. Section 309
b. Murder	2. Section 306
c. Abetment of suicide	3. Section 300
d. Attempt to commit suicide	4. Section 299

Mens Rea can be excluded by

B, a man of unsound mind, sets fire to a dwelling house on A's instigation. Here, B is exempted from criminal liability (Section 84, Indian Penal Code), but A is guilty of abetting mischief by fire with intent to destroy the house. The principle for this criminal liability may be explained by which one of the following explanations?